Scientists outraged over research cuts at South Australian institution, fearing it may spell the end for the museum

The South Australian Museum is undergoing significant changes that have sparked concern among scientists and supporters. CEO David Gaimster plans to reduce the museum’s research capabilities and focus more on the visitor experience. This decision has been met with criticism, with many arguing that research is a crucial aspect of a museum’s role. The museum’s collections are unique resources that have contributed to important discoveries and understanding in various fields. Critics fear that these changes will turn the museum into more of a theme park and damage its reputation in the scientific world. The plan includes replacing science research positions with science curators and reducing the number of science collection managers. The museum’s collections are extensive and require continuous research and curation to thrive. Many researchers who have been instrumental in the museum’s work may not find a place in the reimagined institution, raising concerns about continuity. The decision to no longer support a DNA sequencing lab funded jointly with the University of Adelaide has also raised eyebrows, as it plays a crucial role in biodiversity research. The South Australian Museum has been a primary natural science museum for the interior of the continent for 150 years, and the changes being implemented put its history and future at risk.